
  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
      <title>Data Awesome</title>
      <link>https://data-awesome.com/blog</link>
      <description>Writing on data analytics, Alteryx, AI and the career around them, from ten years leading analytics in airline operations.</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <managingEditor>racine.isacar@gmail.com (Isacar Racine)</managingEditor>
      <webMaster>racine.isacar@gmail.com (Isacar Racine)</webMaster>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
      <atom:link href="https://data-awesome.com/tags/r/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
      
  <item>
    <guid>https://data-awesome.com/blog/variable-selection-regularization</guid>
    <title>Variable Selection, Ridge, Lasso, Elastic Net</title>
    <link>https://data-awesome.com/blog/variable-selection-regularization</link>
    <description>Ridge, lasso and elastic net returned identical test error, to the last digit. The reason is a mistake hiding in a workflow you have copied.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <author>racine.isacar@gmail.com (Isacar Racine)</author>
    <category>regression</category><category>machine-learning</category><category>statistics</category><category>r</category>
  </item>

  <item>
    <guid>https://data-awesome.com/blog/logistic-regression-reading-output</guid>
    <title>How to Read Logistic Regression Output</title>
    <link>https://data-awesome.com/blog/logistic-regression-reading-output</link>
    <description>Your model says 1.60. That cannot be a probability. Four things that go wrong reading logistic output, and none of them throw an error.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <author>racine.isacar@gmail.com (Isacar Racine)</author>
    <category>regression</category><category>statistics</category><category>r</category>
  </item>

  <item>
    <guid>https://data-awesome.com/blog/regression-diagnostics-outliers-multicollinearity</guid>
    <title>The R-Squared Trap: When Cleaning Backfires</title>
    <link>https://data-awesome.com/blog/regression-diagnostics-outliers-multicollinearity</link>
    <description>I removed 53 outliers. R-squared rose from 0.818 to 0.856 and the model got worse. Every number that improved ignored the rows I deleted.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <author>racine.isacar@gmail.com (Isacar Racine)</author>
    <category>regression</category><category>model-diagnostics</category><category>statistics</category><category>r</category>
  </item>

  <item>
    <guid>https://data-awesome.com/blog/multiple-regression-interpreting-coefficients</guid>
    <title>How to Read a Regression Coefficient</title>
    <link>https://data-awesome.com/blog/multiple-regression-interpreting-coefficients</link>
    <description>Your slide says $368. A colleague who ran the same data says $422. Four ways a regression coefficient means less than it appears to.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <author>racine.isacar@gmail.com (Isacar Racine)</author>
    <category>regression</category><category>statistics</category><category>r</category>
  </item>

    </channel>
  </rss>
